I’ve written before about using the social brain vs. survival brain framework to solve problems. Here, I want to give an example of how to use it to approach a current hot button topic, bathrooms.
Much of the anti-trans panic has stoked by whipping up fear that transgender women sharing a bathroom with cisgender women will lead to cisgender women being sexually assaulted. While this is not borne out by the data, it speaks to a deep-rooted assumption in American culture the best way to stay safe is to segregate the “dangerous” people from the “vulnerable” people. In the case of bathrooms, trans exclusion rests on the assumption that cisgender men are inherently dangerous, cisgender women are inherently vulnerable, and the best way to create safety is to segregate the two groups. Trans people are caught in the crossfire.
In reality, however, segregation does not create safety because instead of addressing unsafe behaviors in a space, it substitutes controlling who is allowed to exist in that space. This is a mistake. What creates safety in bathrooms is people consistently following a few straightforward behavioral norms: do not touch other people, do not ogle other people, do not make comments about other people’s bodies, respect privacy. There are some slight complexities in that people often make eye contact and nod in greeting, or friends may joke around, but anyone who struggles to know what appropriate boundaries are has a 100% effective fallback strategy: do not speak, look at, or touch anyone until you leave. Creating safety is extraordinarily simple.
What is not simple is how to respond when people violate these norms, whether accidentally or with the intent to cause harm. But a safe society puts mechanisms in place to address boundary violations early, nonviolently, and effectively. It creates a series of boundaries that serve as warning signals, providing escalating opportunities to test whether a boundary violation is inadvertent or malicious and to intervene before serious harm is done.
Continue reading “Safety, Not Segregation”

